Munich · Snapshot August 2026

How hard is it to book a specialist online in Munich?

We looked at all 2,238 specialist profiles in Munich across seven fields on Doctolib, Germany's largest booking platform. At 350 practices we then compared directly what the same practice offered a publicly and a privately insured patient. Private patients could book at 90% of these practices and typically waited 8 days. Public patients could book at 58%. The other 42% showed them no appointment at all for the next three months.

Public (GKV)Private (PKV)

Share of practices with a bookable online appointment

58%
90%

Median wait, where booking was possible

21 days
8 days
90%
of sampled practices offered privately insured patients a bookable appointment, median wait 8 days
316 of 350 practices
21 d
median wait for publicly insured patients where booking was possible at all, versus 8 days privately
202 of 350 practices bookable
62%
of surveyed Munich psychotherapists treat private patients only
103 of 166 profiles that state whom they treat
42%
of all 2,238 surveyed profiles list English as a consultation language
931 of 2,238 profiles

Finding 1

Public patients wait two to six times longer than private patients

In cardiology, half of all bookable public appointments in Munich were more than two months out; the private median was 9 days. Dermatology follows with 55 against 11 days, ophthalmology with 33 against 9.

Median days to the next first appointment, by specialty

Munich

Public (GKV)Private (PKV)days
Cardiology
60
9
Dermatology
55
11
Ophthalmology
33
9
Gynaecology
33
15
Orthopaedics
14
7
ENT
11
6
Psychotherapy
7
9
Data table (exact values)
Public (GKV)Private (PKV)
Cardiology60 days9 days
Dermatology55 days11 days
Ophthalmology33 days9 days
Gynaecology33 days15 days
Orthopaedics14 days7 days
ENT11 days6 days
Psychotherapy7 days9 days
Figure 1. TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, Munich.

Psychotherapy runs against the pattern: the few public first sessions that were bookable at all came quickly. The barrier there is not the wait but getting a calendar in the first place, as Finding 2 shows. At single practices the gap stretches much further than the medians: one cardiology practice listed the next public appointment 187 days out and the next private one after 8; a dermatology practice listed 195 versus 34, an ear, nose and throat (ENT) practice 181 versus 22.

Finding 2

4 in 10 practices had no online appointment for public patients

Across all fields, 42% of Munich practices showed public patients no appointment at all. The lowest share of the six regions, but still four in ten.

Practices with no online appointment for public patients

Munich · sample, 50 bookable practices per specialty

  • Psychotherapy70%35 of 50
  • Dermatology58%29 of 50
  • Gynaecology50%25 of 50
  • Cardiology36%18 of 50
  • Ophthalmology32%16 of 50
  • Orthopaedics30%15 of 50
  • ENT20%10 of 50
Data table (exact values)
ShareCount
Psychotherapy70%35 of 50
Dermatology58%29 of 50
Gynaecology50%25 of 50
Cardiology36%18 of 50
Ophthalmology32%16 of 50
Orthopaedics30%15 of 50
ENT20%10 of 50
Figure 2. TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, Munich.

Finding 3

42% without a public appointment: 18% exclude public patients, 24% release nothing

Among the 350 practices in the sample, the public-insurance gap has two distinct mechanisms, and they deserve to be read separately.

What 350 bookable Munich practices offered publicly insured patients

Sample

  • 202 · 58% · GKV appointments bookablemedian wait 21 days
  • 63 · 18% · excluded from online bookingsame appointment type open to private patients
  • 85 · 24% · no GKV appointments released70 with GKV enabled, 15 without an insurance step
Data table (exact values)
PracticesShare
GKV appointments bookable20258%
excluded from online booking6318%
no GKV appointments released8524%
Figure 3. TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, Munich.

These are not empty calendars: 125 of the 148 practices without a public appointment showed an open, bookable private appointment at the same moment. Where both insurance types had a published date at the same practice (191 practices), 93 showed the same date; at 93 the private patient came first and at 5 the public patient, with single-practice gaps of up to 187 days.

Finding 4

6 in 10 surveyed Munich psychotherapists treat private patients only

The full profile count covers every reachable profile, 2,238 in total. Where a profile states which insurance it accepts, the share that treats private patients only varies enormously by field. Psychotherapy leads, as it does in every city of this series so far.

Private-only share among practices who state on their profile whom they treat

Munich profile count · 1,201 of 2,238 profiles declare a status

  • Psychotherapy62%103 of 166
  • Dermatology49%93 of 188
  • Cardiology27%33 of 121
  • Orthopaedics24%44 of 182
  • Gynaecology15%52 of 346
  • ENT9%9 of 105
  • Ophthalmology6%6 of 93
Data table (exact values)
ShareCount
Psychotherapy62%103 of 166
Dermatology49%93 of 188
Cardiology27%33 of 121
Orthopaedics24%44 of 182
Gynaecology15%52 of 346
ENT9%9 of 105
Ophthalmology6%6 of 93
Figure 4. TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, Munich profile count.

Finding 5

English-speaking doctors: more than in Berlin

Across the full profile count, 42% of profiles list English as a consultation language, four points above Berlin. Orthopaedics and cardiology lead; ophthalmology trails. The fields with the most English-speaking profiles, orthopaedics and cardiology, are also fields with few public appointments. Whether the same practices treat private patients only is not in this chart; that cross-check is planned for the next snapshot.

Share of profiles listing English as a consultation language

Munich profile count · all 2,238 reachable profiles

  • Orthopaedics54%173 of 322
  • Cardiology53%133 of 249
  • Dermatology45%165 of 368
  • Gynaecology42%248 of 595
  • ENT37%76 of 207
  • Psychotherapy34%89 of 261
  • Ophthalmology20%47 of 236
Data table (exact values)
ShareCount
Orthopaedics54%173 of 322
Cardiology53%133 of 249
Dermatology45%165 of 368
Gynaecology42%248 of 595
ENT37%76 of 207
Psychotherapy34%89 of 261
Ophthalmology20%47 of 236
Figure 5. TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, Munich profile count.

Conclusions

What these numbers mean, stated plainly

The conclusions below stay within what the data can support.

  1. Munich's online booking is a private-insurance channel first. Privately insured patients could book at 90% of sampled practices, publicly insured patients at 58%, and 84% of the practices that showed public patients nothing had an open private appointment at the same moment.
  2. Munich's distinctive gap is time, not only access. Where both insurance types could book, the public median was 21 days against 8. In cardiology 60 against 9, in dermatology 55 against 11. Berlin's inequality sits mostly in access; Munich adds a measured waiting-time gap on top.
  3. The gap is configured, not coincidental. 18% of practices exclude public patients from the online first appointment outright, in psychotherapy 24 of 50 sampled practices, the highest count in the city.
  4. In psychotherapy, private cover is close to a precondition for online access. 62% of declared profiles treat private patients only, and 70% of bookable practices showed public patients no first session within 98 days.
  5. For English speakers, the two gaps overlap by field. English-language care is easier to find than in Berlin (42% of profiles), and the fields where it is most common are also fields with few public appointments. Whether the same practices are private-only is a question for the next snapshot.

What this means for you

Does this apply to you?

In Munich, 42% of the 350 sampled practices showed public patients no online appointment; private patients could book at 90%. Whether the private side is open to you depends on three things: how you are employed, what you earn, and your health when you join.

Employed, more than 77,400 euros gross a year

You may leave the public system. Your employer pays half of a private premium, up to 613.22 euros a month in 2026, the same amount it pays towards public insurance.

Self-employed or freelance

You can choose private cover at any income. You pay the full premium yourself, as you already pay the full public contribution today: around 21% of income, care insurance included.

Below 77,400 euros, or staying public

The private calendar is closed to you, the other doors are not. With a referral code, the 116117 appointment service must arrange a specialist appointment within four weeks; practices still book by phone, and none of the seven fields needs a referral.

What it costs in 2026

Private
500 to 600 euros a month at 30, 650 to 750 euros at 40 and 850 to 950 euros at 45, in a very good tariff with a deductible of up to 600 euros, care insurance included. Employees get half paid by the employer.
Public
21.1% of income with children, 21.7% without, care insurance included; at the contribution cap about 1,226 to 1,261 euros a month.

When we advise against switching

  • From about 50 with a medical history
  • From about 50 when your pension will be the state pension
  • One earner with two or three children: free family cover exists only in the public system
  • Self-employed with an income that swings strongly

The way back into the public system narrows with age and usually closes at 55.

Unsure what this means for your own health insurance?

A free 30-minute call. We check whether you can switch, what it would cost you, and whether it is worth it in your case. If it is not, we say so.

Common questions

Do publicly insured patients need a referral to see these specialists?

No. Statutory patients in Germany may see dermatologists, orthopaedists, cardiologists, gynaecologists, ENT doctors, ophthalmologists and psychotherapists directly. A referral is only mandatory for fields such as radiology or laboratory medicine, none of which are part of this study. Practices may still ask for a referral as their own policy.

Does this mean public patients cannot get appointments at all?

No. The study measures the online direct-booking channel on one day. Phone and GP referral are open to everyone, and publicly insured patients can also use the appointment service 116117. What the data shows is that the convenient digital path that private patients use freely is only partly available to them, and slower where it is.

Do private patients always wait less at the same practice?

Not always. At 191 Munich practices both insurance types could book. At 93 the dates were identical, at 93 the private patient came first, at 5 the public patient, with single-practice gaps up to 187 days. The larger inequality is access: 42% of sampled practices showed public patients no appointment at all, while 90% offered private patients one.

Am I allowed to switch to private insurance?

Employees may leave the public system once their gross salary is above the Jahresarbeitsentgeltgrenze (JAEG), 77,400 euros a year in 2026. Self-employed people and freelancers can choose private cover at any income, civil servants generally. Everyone else stays in the public system. Being allowed in is the first step; insurers also ask about your health and can add a surcharge, exclude a condition or decline. Who can get private health insurance in Germany?

What does private insurance cost compared with public insurance?

Private premiums depend on your age and health when you join, not on your income. In 2026 a healthy applicant pays around 500 to 600 euros a month at 30, 650 to 750 euros at 40 and 850 to 950 euros at 45, in a very good tariff with a deductible of up to 600 euros, care insurance included; employers pay half of that, up to 613.22 euros a month. Public insurance takes 21.1% of gross income with children and 21.7% without, care insurance included, up to about 1,226 to 1,261 euros a month at the contribution cap. How much does health insurance cost in Germany?

Does private insurance mean better treatment?

Not by itself. Public and private patients see the same doctors and the same hospitals. This study measures one thing only: whether a practice shows an online appointment and how soon. It says nothing about the quality of treatment, and nothing about whether private cover is the right choice for any one person.

Is the consultation with TheGoodBroker really free?

Yes, all of it: the call, the comparison across the whole market, the application and every question in the years after. Brokers are paid by the insurer you eventually choose, and German insurers charge the same premium with or without a broker. If private cover is not the right fit, we say so. How the free consultation works

Reading aid

How to read the numbers

Bookable practice
A doctor's practice (in German: Praxis) with active online booking on Doctolib on the snapshot day. Practices without online booking are counted in the profile count and never enter the availability figures.
First appointment
The earliest appointment a new patient can book for the specialty's standard first visit, queried twice at the same practice: once as a publicly insured patient (GKV, the system that TK, AOK or Barmer belong to), once as a privately insured patient (PKV).
98-day window
How far ahead we looked, about three months. "No appointment" means the calendar showed nothing bookable for that insurance type in the whole window. Waits beyond it come from the platform's own next-appointment field and are labelled as platform figures.
Median wait
The middle value: half of the bookable practices offered a sooner appointment, half a later one. Medians count only practices where that insurance type could book at all, so a short median can sit next to a large share of practices with no appointment.
Accepted insurance (as stated on the profile)
Whether the profile says which patients the practice treats: publicly and privately insured, or privately insured only. Behind it is how a practice bills. A practice with a public licence (in German: Kassenzulassung) bills the public insurers and treats both groups; a private practice (Privatpraxis) has no such licence and bills privately insured and self-paying patients directly. Only some profiles state this, and private-only shares are always reported against the profiles that do.

Method and limits

What this study measures, and what it does not

  1. Two layers. A profile count of all 2,238 reachable profiles (languages, which insurance the profile says it accepts, online bookability; 2,378 listed, 140 unreachable), and an sample of 350 bookable practices, 50 per specialty, drawn evenly across all result pages to avoid the platform's availability-based ranking bias.
  2. Platform and insurance categories. The platform surveyed is Doctolib, Germany's largest medical booking platform. The private query corresponds to the platform's own category for privately insured patients; self-paying patients use the same channel. Both queries per practice ran immediately one after the other on the day.
  3. Digital access only. Appointments by phone or via a GP referral are open to both insurance types. Publicly insured patients can also use the appointment service 116117 (Terminservicestelle), which arranges an appointment within four weeks with a referral code and is not available to private patients. The finding is precisely that the direct digital channel open to private patients is largely closed to public patients.
  4. No referral is legally required for any of the seven specialties studied. The comparison concerns the identical referral-free first appointment for both insurance types. The platform encodes referral requirements in structured form; none of the sampled first appointments carried one.
  5. Snapshot, not a season. Practices release appointments in waves. Where booking is enabled but no appointment appeared, closed public quotas and genuinely full calendars cannot be fully separated from one day of data; the open private calendars at the same practices point to closed quotas. The study repeats quarterly.
  6. Accepted insurance is stated by 54% of profiles; private-only shares are reported against the profiles that state it and labelled as such. English listing is the practice's own declaration.
  7. Medians are counted across bookable practices only and rounded to whole days in charts; the data tables carry exact values. Waits beyond the 98-day scan come from the platform's own next-appointment field. Where both insurance types could book at the same practice, the two dates are compared directly (191 Munich practices: 93 identical, 93 earlier for private patients, 5 earlier for public patients).

Funding and conflict of interest. TheGoodBroker advises on private health insurance and may receive commission from an insurer when a policy is concluded. This study was not funded or influenced by any insurer. Method and aggregate results are published for independent review. The study measures booking availability; it makes no statement on whether private health insurance is the better choice for any individual.

Sources. [1] § 75 Abs. 1a SGB V: the appointment service 116117 must arrange a specialist appointment within four weeks for patients with a referral code. [2] § 76 SGB V: free choice of doctor in the public system. [3] Bundesmantelvertrag-Ärzte § 13 Abs. 4: the specialties that require a referral (laboratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine, pathology and others); none of the seven fields in this study is among them. Legal position as at September 2026.

Cite this study

Every figure on this page may be reused with attribution. Suggested citations:

TheGoodBroker (2026): Specialist Access Study, Munich snapshot of 26 August 2026. Census of 2,238 specialist profiles and sample of 350 bookable practices across 7 specialties, public online booking data. thegoodbroker.de/research/specialist-access-munich
Single figure: "In Munich, privately insured patients could book a specialist appointment online at 90% of sampled practices, with a median wait of 8 days. Publicly insured patients could book at 58% and waited a median of 21 days; the remaining 42% of practices showed them no appointment at all within 98 days." TheGoodBroker Specialist Access Study, 26 August 2026.

Press enquiries: Jonas Marx, j.marx@thegoodbroker.de. Releases and material on the press page. Figures, charts and the CSV are free to reuse with attribution.

Licence: CC BY 4.0 (reuse with attribution and link).

The series

Six metropolitan regions, one method, one day

Each city is surveyed and published separately so that every result is citable on its own, in an English and a German edition so that every result can be cited on its own. A combined report aggregates the six regions.

TheGoodBroker · Independent insurance broker (licensed under Sec. 34d German Trade Code). This study reports measured booking availability. It is not medical advice, not an assessment of treatment quality, and no statement about individual insurers or tariffs. Data collected from publicly accessible booking pages; no personal data was gathered; practice names are withheld.